- / -
EMSC3025/6025: Remote Sensing of Water Resources

By the end of this module, you will be able to:
This lecture answers two questions about a volume of soil or rock.
Porosity answers this. It depends on the amount of void space.
Hydraulic conductivity answers this. It depends on how the voids connect.
A common mistake is to assume that the answer to one question gives the answer to the other. It does not. Clay has one of the highest porosities of the materials in this lecture, and one of the lowest conductivities.


For grains of one size, porosity is set by how they are stacked.
Take identical spheres. The loosest stable stacking is cubic, each sphere sitting directly on the one below:
The tightest is rhombohedral, each sphere resting in the hollow between three others:
Both numbers are independent of the size of the spheres. Void volume and total volume both increase with the cube of the radius, so their ratio stays the same. A box of marbles and a box of beach balls have the same porosity.

Compaction pushes the grains of a real sediment from the loose arrangement towards the tight one. This lowers the porosity without changing the grain size.
In the table of measured values, finer materials tend to have higher porosity. This is a pattern in the data. It does not mean that small grains cause high porosity. In a well-sorted material, grain size has no effect on porosity. Clay is porous because of the shape and charge of its particles.
Grain size does control conductivity: later in this lecture we show that

The name of a rock, for example “limestone”, tells you little about its porosity. Its history of fracturing and dissolution tells you much more.
| Material | Min | Mean | Max | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unconsolidated deposits | ||||
| Sand | 28.1 | 38.9 | 44.4 | 4.9 |
| Dune | c | 42.1 | c | 8.3 |
| Silt | 31.5 | 45.2 | 50.8 | 5.6 |
| Clay | 40.1 | 46.1 | 55 | 4.5 |
| Glacial till | 14.3 | 23.5 | 34 | c |
| Peat | c | 92 | c | c |
Values in per cent. “c” means there were too few measurements to give a value. Field values for sand and gravel are usually lower, 25 to 35%, because the laboratory samples in this table were loosely packed.
| Material | Min | Mean | Max | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sedimentary rocks | ||||
| Sandstone | 4 | 20.4 | 28.6 | 8.6 |
| Limestone | 0.44 | 8.67 | 34.7 | 8.6 |
| Dolostone | 0.4 | 7.46 | 26 | c |
| Shale | 0.75 | 10.8 | 27.2 | 8.3 |
| Igneous rocks | ||||
| Granite | <0.001 | 0.01 | ||
| Basalt | <0.01 | 0.1 |
Sandstone has lower porosity than sand because mineral cement fills part of the pore space. Burial and chemical change after deposition (diagenesis) reduce porosity further with age and depth. Unfractured igneous rock has almost no porosity, so in granite nearly all the water is in fractures like those in the figure two slides back.
Water cannot flow through every void. Effective porosity
In a clean sand or gravel all the pores connect, and
In a fractured rock they do not. The pores of a shale hold water but connect poorly, so the water that flows, flows in the fractures. The fracture porosity
Below the weathered zone near the surface, fractures are typically tens to hundreds of micrometres wide. Fractures 100 µm wide and one metre apart give
Typical fracture porosities are

Schwartz & Zhang p. 45 gives
A fractured rock has two porosities, and each one has a different role.
| Matrix | Fractures | |
|---|---|---|
| Porosity | 0.05 – 0.15 | |
| Holds the water | yes | no |
| Carries the flow | no | yes |

Two wells drilled to the same depth, in two materials with the same porosity of 0.30.
| Gravel | Silt | |
|---|---|---|
| Porosity | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Water stored per m³ | 300 L | 300 L |
| Hydraulic conductivity | ||
| Yield to a well | supplies a town | fills a bucket |
Both materials hold the same amount of water. Only the gravel releases it to a well at a useful rate.
Clay has a mean porosity of 46%, among the highest in the porosity table. It also has the lowest hydraulic conductivity of the sediments in the conductivity figure later in this lecture. Clay is nearly half water by volume, but a well in clay yields almost nothing.


Surface runoff reaches the stream in hours. Groundwater takes years.
Residence time is the length of the flow path divided by the speed of the water. The formula for the speed comes from Darcy’s law, later in this lecture:
| System | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hillslope to creek, sand | 300 m | 0.15 m/day | 5 years |
| Small basin, sand and gravel | 20 km | 0.5 m/day | 100 years |
| Great Artesian Basin | 1000 km | 1 m/year |
A store with a residence time of
The groundwater management lecture returns to this, and Assignment III uses the same calculation.
Take a column of water standing still in a tube. Pressure at depth
Pressure alone cannot tell you the direction of flow. The quantity that can is hydraulic head.
Pressure changes from the top to the bottom of the column, but head stays the same. Where head is constant, there is no flow, however the pressure varies.
The energy of a unit weight of water at a point has three parts. This is the Bernoulli equation, written in units of length:
Groundwater moves at about 1 m/day, which is
compared with head differences of metres. We therefore ignore the velocity head:

Going down the still column, the pressure head increases by exactly as much as the elevation head
The water level in a standpipe that is open at the bottom gives the head at the open end.
In principle (a): read the elevation of the water level against a scale. In the figure it is 110 m above sea level.
In practice (b): the pipe has no scale on it, so head is calculated from two measurements.
This is the head at the measurement point, the middle of the screen at the bottom of the pipe. It is not the head at the water table.
The screen is a slotted section of casing that lets water in. Its open area lets the water level in the pipe follow changes in the ground, which matters most in low-conductivity ground.

Two pipes at one site, screened at different depths. The shallow one reads 84 m. The deep one reads 73 m.
The observation well differs from the other two. Its measurement point is not the middle of the screen. It is the water table, which moves up and down through the year. Pressure head at the water table is zero, so head there equals the elevation of the water table.

In the figure the nest reads 84, 81 and 78 m from shallow to deep. Head decreases with depth, so flow in the shallow unit is downward.
Henry Darcy, a civil engineer, built the water supply of Dijon in the 1850s. He needed to know how large to make the sand filters.
His apparatus was a cylinder of cross-section area
He changed the flow rate, the head difference, the length of the column and the type of sand, and found one relationship:
Darcy’s law is an empirical law, like Ohm’s law, and it has the same form: a flux proportional to the gradient of a potential.

The textbook’s equation 3.5 uses

The gradient has no units: here the head falls by four millimetres for each metre of distance.
Water flows only through the connected voids, which make up a fraction
Because
Use

Use
(a) Granular sand,
(b) Fractured shale, same
Both rocks have the same conductivity, the same gradient and the same discharge
Note: the textbook prints 0.152 m/day as the answer to (a). Its own numbers give 0.115 m/day.
Darcy measured
For laminar flow in a tube of diameter
Write the pressure in terms of head,
The specific discharge is
Grains ten times larger give a conductivity one hundred times larger. This explains most of the range of
Too fast: turbulence. The derivation assumed laminar flow. To test this, calculate a Reynolds number from the grain diameter:
and the law holds for
| Setting | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sand aquifer | 1 m/day | 1 mm | 0.01 |
| Coarse gravel | 100 m/day | 10 mm | 12 |
| Karst conduit, near a pumped well | much larger | much larger |
At higher
Too slow: a threshold. In clays with very low permeability, charged mineral surfaces hold the nearby water tightly. The water may not move at all until the gradient is larger than a minimum value (Bolt and Groenevelt, 1969).
Both failures happen only at the extremes. In nearly every aquifer, Darcy’s law is accurate enough, and the theory lecture builds on it.
This course covers two cases where the law fails in practice: karst conduits, in the aquifers lecture, and the area directly around a pumping well, in the well hydraulics lecture.

What this means for a site investigation. An error of a factor of two in the gradient gives an error of a factor of two in the flow. An error in the type of material can give an error of a factor of
The derivation split
Temperature changes
| 5 °C | 1.00 | |
| 25 °C | 1.71 |
The same rock has a conductivity 1.7 times higher at 25 °C than at 5 °C, although the rock itself has not changed.
The derivation gave
| Source | Equation |
|---|---|
| Hazen (1911) | |
| Harleman (1963) | |
| Kozeny–Carman |
Because the smallest grains (the fines) control the flow. In a sand with 10% clay, the clay particles fill the narrow openings between the sand grains. These openings control the resistance to flow, so the clay lowers
The same idea returns later in this lecture, in the vertical conductivity of layered ground. There too, the least conductive material controls the result.
Example from the tutorial:
Used for coarse material,
Hold the head difference
When the flow is steady, measure the outflow rate
Rearrange Darcy’s law to get
The overflow at the top keeps the supply head constant. Without it, the head falls as the reservoir drains, and the flow is no longer steady.
This is the same set-up as Darcy’s experiment.

Used for fine material: fine sands through to clays.
There is no constant supply. Water in a standpipe of cross-section area
The choice of test is practical. In a clay, the flow
Both tests measure a core a few centimetres across, which the coring has disturbed. The next section asks whether this value describes the whole aquifer.

Each red outline shows how far water travels from a point in one unit of time. A circle means that
The main point of this section: heterogeneity at a small scale becomes anisotropy at a larger scale. A stack of layers, each of them isotropic, behaves as one anisotropic material when you look at the stack as a whole.
Thirty-two measurements of
| value (m/s) | |
|---|---|
| smallest | |
| largest | |
| arithmetic mean | |
| geometric mean | |
| harmonic mean |
It depends on the direction of flow relative to the layers. The next two slides show why:
Flow along the bedding. Each layer has the same head drop over the same distance, so each has the same gradient
a thickness-weighted arithmetic mean.
The most conductive layer controls
Each layer carries
Flow across the bedding. Now the same
a harmonic mean.
Now the least conductive layer controls
Electrical resistors behave in the same way. In parallel, the path with the lowest resistance carries most of the current. In series, the largest resistance controls the total.
The two grey layers make up a fifth of the thickness but cause nearly all of the head loss. A piezometer nest through this stack would show almost constant head in the sandy layers, and a steep drop in head across the grey ones.
A 300 m sequence of interbedded sandstone and shale, 75% sandstone. Both rocks are isotropic.
| Material | Horizontal | Vertical | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anhydrite | 10 | ||
| Chalk | 2 | ||
| Limestone, dolomite | 2 | ||
| Sandstone | 2 | ||
| Shale | 10 | ||
| Salt | 1 |
The word “anisotropy” covers two different causes at two different scales. When you give a ratio, say which one you mean.
In an anisotropic material,
Each component of the flow depends on all three components of the gradient:

In anisotropic ground, flow lines do not cross equipotential lines at right angles. Right angles are correct only in isotropic ground, but almost every map you will see assumes them.
Two conditions hold where flow crosses from unit 1 into unit 2. The angle
Mass is conserved, so the component of
Head is continuous across the boundary, so the head gradient along it is the same on both sides. With
Divide the second equation by the first to get the tangent law of refraction:

Two limiting cases are easy to remember:
Into the shale. Use the layered example again. Water in the sandstone that meets the boundary at 45° enters the shale at
Whatever the direction of flow in the sandstone, the water crosses the shale vertically. This is why cross sections show vertical arrows through every confining bed, and why flow through a confining bed can be treated as one-dimensional.
Into the sandstone. In the opposite case, the flow turns until it is nearly parallel to the bedding. A thin permeable bed therefore collects flow from the layers above and below it, and carries it sideways.
Together, these two results explain flow in layered ground. Water flows sideways in the conductive units and vertically through the less conductive units between them. Next week’s lecture covers these units in more detail.
The cross section at the end of this lecture shows both results: the flow arrows bend as they cross the contact.

Three steps: plot the measured heads, draw contours, then add arrows at right angles to the contours, pointing towards lower head.
For an unconfined aquifer the two are the same, because the top of the saturated zone is the water table.
For a confined aquifer the potentiometric surface is above the top of the aquifer, often far above. It shows the level to which water would rise in a well. There is no water at that level in the ground.
Where the potentiometric surface is above the ground surface, a well flows without pumping. This is an artesian bore, and the Great Artesian Basin is named after them.
Flow arrows are drawn at right angles to the contours. This is correct only in isotropic material.
In layered ground, which is most ground, the flow direction turns away from the right angle, towards the direction with higher conductivity.



This figure brings together the main ideas of this lecture: heads measured at points, a gradient, two conductivities, refraction, and the flow direction that results from them.
Since 2002, satellites have answered this question directly. Water has mass, so a change in stored water changes the gravity field, and satellites can measure that change.
The Millennium Drought removed about 140 km³ of water from the Murray-Darling Basin.
Spread over the basin’s
GRACE detects this 13 cm change from an altitude of about 490 km.
In return, GRACE gives something that no network of bores can: a monthly total for the whole basin, over twenty years, that does not depend on where bores were drilled.
Gravity measures all the water in the column at once:
To get groundwater, subtract the other stores, each estimated from a separate data source:
Leblanc et al. (2009) tested it over the Murray-Darling Basin against ground measurements.
The groundwater estimate from GRACE agrees well with the bore measurements.
Assignments II and III ask you to do this calculation, with the CSR mascons for total storage and the ESA CCI record for soil moisture.
Murray-Darling Basin, 2001 to 2007, from Leblanc et al. (2009):
| Store | Change | Over what period |
|---|---|---|
| Soil moisture | 2001 to 2003 | |
| Surface water | 2001 to 2003 | |
| Groundwater | 2001 to 2007 |
A drought moves through the water stores in order of their residence times. Rainfall falls first, then soil moisture within months, then streamflow, then groundwater over years. Groundwater also recovers last.
By the rainfall record, the drought ended in 2007. By groundwater storage, it had not.
Next week: aquifers. The different types of aquifer, and how much water they release when the head falls.